# Review a public research or pipeline page.

By Hilvy. Updated 2026-10-25.

Use approved public programme material with a scientific content owner. Do not include unpublished research, participant or patient data.

Output: A programme-page brief with sources, stage definitions and review ownership.

- [ ] Identify the reader’s question.
  Choose a partner, scientific reader, investor or recruit and the decision they face.
  Keep: One audience and task.
  Owner: ____________________
  Notes: ____________________

- [ ] Define the programme stage.
  Use the scientific team’s approved terminology and qualifications.
  Keep: Current stage wording and date.
  Owner: ____________________
  Notes: ____________________

- [ ] Link authoritative evidence.
  Check publications, identifiers, dates and the claims each source actually supports.
  Keep: A source register.
  Owner: ____________________
  Notes: ____________________

- [ ] Review contact boundaries.
  Separate collaboration, recruitment and clinical-participation routes.
  Keep: Approved contact destinations.
  Owner: ____________________
  Notes: ____________________

- [ ] Name the next reviewer.
  Decide who updates pipeline changes, corrections and withdrawn materials.
  Keep: A review owner and cadence.
  Owner: ____________________
  Notes: ____________________

A blank review worksheet from Hilvy. Checkbox changes on the web page are not included in this download.
This is not an audit, certification, legal advice or a guarantee of search performance.
https://www.hilvy.io