An honest comparison of Astro and Next.js — use cases, trade-offs, and when each is the right choice.
Selected Work
Practical comparison across the dimensions that matter most.
Both Astro and Next.js solve real problems differently. This comparison is based on hands-on experience building with both.
| Capability | AstroRecommended | Next.js |
|---|---|---|
| Design control | ||
| CMS | ||
| Performance | ||
| SEO | ||
| Pricing |
No pitch deck — just an honest read on migration scope, CMS modelling, and whether your stack belongs on Webflow.
Astro
Astro for marketing
Next.js
Next.js for marketing
Depends on team and needs.
Astro
Astro for content
Next.js
Next.js for content
Evaluate the editor experience.
We’ll map your content model, integrations, and publishing workflow — then recommend what actually fits.
B2B SaaS, agencies, education, professional services — performance-first launches with retainers that stick.
Both Astro and Next.js are production-ready. The right choice depends on your team, content model, and roadmap.
Book a 15-min call. We'll recommend the right stack based on your content model, integrations, and goals — then ship it end to end if we're a fit.
Your project is in the right hands
A wealth of experience across a range of disciplines — from front-end development and backend engineering to QA, strategy, and beyond.